
Interpreting NAPOLI 3 Data and the Clinical Meaning of Dose Modifications in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Experts discuss evolving treatment strategies for metastatic pancreatic cancer, comparing NALIRIFOX and FOLFIRINOX in first-line therapy decisions.
This segment focuses on findings from the NAPOLI 3 trial that most clearly differentiate Nalirifox from FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Faculty review overall survival outcomes and discuss why these results have influenced treatment paradigms in first line metastatic disease.
A major focus is the post hoc analysis demonstrating improved survival among patients who required dose reductions. Panelists explore how these findings should be interpreted, including concerns related to selection bias, while emphasizing their relevance to real world practice. Rather than viewing dose reductions as a compromise, faculty describe them as part of proactive toxicity management that allows patients to remain on therapy longer.
The discussion highlights how adverse event monitoring, early intervention, and individualized dosing strategies support sustained treatment exposure without sacrificing efficacy. Faculty share real world experience applying these principles and explain how thoughtful dose adjustments can enhance both safety and long term outcomes.
This segment reinforces the importance of translating clinical trial data into practical approaches that reflect the realities of treating patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

























































































