
Opinion|Videos|July 10, 2024
Exploring Toxicities for Second Line Treatments in mCRC
The panel examines prevalent adverse events experienced by patients receiving second-line biomarker-directed therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

- Briefly discuss common AEs for patients treated with 2L biomarker-directed therapy for mCRC.
- What similarities and differences can be observed based on specific clinically actionable targets?
- What strategies have you explored to mitigate and manage those events?
- Dr Marshall: Based on the following data updates presented in mCRC, how does this impact the future treatment landscape in the second line setting?
Advertisement
Related to this article

In case you missed any, check out our recap of the episodes of OncLive On Air that aired in June 2026.

Phase 1/2 data from 2 trials showed high ORRs with zoldonrasib-based regimens in first-line and previously treated RAS G12D metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In EMERALD-3, STRIDE with or without lenvatinib plus TACE improved PFS, ORR, and DOR vs TACE alone by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria in HCC.

The success of RASolute 302 positions daraxonrasib to transform RAS-mutant pancreatic cancer care and accelerate pan-RAS development across tumors.

First-line domvanalimab plus zimberelimab and chemotherapy did not improve OS vs nivolumab plus chemotherapy in HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer.

Longer duration of adjuvant FOLFOX and atezolizumab was associated with improved DFS in a retrospective analysis of the ATOMIC trial.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Ensartinib Reduces Recurrence Risk After Resection in ALK-Positive NSCLC
2
FDA Approves Pembrolizumab Plus Enfortumab Vedotin in MIBC
3
Rocbrutinib Displays Durable Activity in Covalent BTK Inhibitor–Pretreated R/R MCL
4
FDA Approves Subcutaneous Isatuximab Delivered Via On-Body Delivery System for Multiple Myeloma
5

