
Opinion|Videos|October 28, 2024
First-Line ESA vs Luspatercept in LR-MDS: Choosing the Most Appropriate Treatment Option for Each Individual Patient
Panelists discuss how their clinical experience with ESA failure rates and timelines compares with reported outcomes in large community practice studies, and how they counsel patients on the choice between luspatercept and ESAs as first-line therapy for lower-risk MDS, incorporating patient preferences and patient-reported outcomes from recent clinical trials.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please describe: In your clinical practice, what percentage of your patients have disease that fails ESA? What is the general time frame where you may see ESA failure?
- How does this compare with reported ESA outcomes? Resource link: Gordan L, et al. LR-MDS large US community practice: pt outcomes post ESA Tx. EHA 2024 abstract.
- Please describe what you typically counsel and/or share with your patients when considering luspatercept vs ESA as first-line therapy for LR-MDS. How do you take into consideration the patient’s preference
Resource link: Olivia EN, et al. Patient-reported outcomes from COMMANDS study. ASH 2023 abstract.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Single-Center, Retrospective Data Show Low Rate of Lifileucel Infusion Following Referral in Advanced Melanoma
2
Real-World Data Support Clinical Benefit With Lifileucel in Previously Treated Advanced Melanoma
3
Outcomes With Bridging Therapy Correlate With Cilta-Cel Efficacy, Safety in Multiple Myeloma
4
Long-Term Cilta-Cel Data Show Low Rates of PFS Events in Standard-Risk R/R Myeloma
5





































