
Individualizing Treatment Selection in Steroid-Refractory Chronic GVHD
This segment brings the approved therapies side by side and asks what actually drives treatment selection.
Episodes in this series

This segment brings the approved therapies side by side and asks what actually drives treatment selection. Faculty agree there is rarely a single deciding factor, weighing organ involvement, prior exposure, route and frequency of administration, comorbidities, and access together. A key caution emerges: because pivotal trials did not restrict agents to specific manifestations, choosing a drug on organ involvement alone is not well supported by evidence. Instead, faculty describe individualizing therapy around the patient in front of them, often leading with a toxicity-first philosophy, asking not only which drug a patient is most likely to respond to, but which they are least likely to tolerate. Access and patient preference frequently become the determining factors, since a therapy only helps if the patient can reliably receive it. The discussion also reframes goals of therapy, emphasizing that in refractory disease a durable partial response supporting daily function can be as clinically meaningful as complete response.
Related to this article








