Pathologist's Role in Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer

Video

For High-Definition, Click

The importance of biomarker and molecular assays in the care of the patient with breast cancer continues to expand as more research is conducted, David J. Dabbs, MD, explains. The standard process at many institutions involves an examination of the breast cancer tissue using traditional pathology methodologies for grading, staging, and diagnosis. This information should be closely integrated with the hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and other data from pathological tests that may be performed, notes Dabbs.

In general, each laboratory should follow the ASCO/CAP guidelines for biomarker testing, specifically for HER2 and hormone receptor status, Dabbs suggests. These guidelines set recommendations for proper biomarker analysis and identification. Additionally, they provide recommendations on testing methodology.

Genomic profiling assays, such as Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, and Nanostring, are ideally utilized in tumors that are intermediate grade, Dabbs suggests. These tumors have a lot of variability that would benefit from the additional information gleaned from genomic assays.

Related Videos
Shruti Tiwari, MD
Nan Chen, MD
Julia Foldi, MD, PhD
Video 4 - "The Evolving Treatment Landscape with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Early HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer"
Margaret E. Gatti-Mays, MD, MPH, FACP, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sangeeta Goswami, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ko Un “Clara” Park, MD
Erin Frances Cobain, MD
Video 3 - "5-Year Data from the MonarchE Trial Investigating Abemaciclib in HR+, HER2- High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer"
Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD, discusses an exploratory analysis from the FLAURA2 trial of osimertinib plus chemotherapy in treatment-naive, EGFR-mutant NSCLC.