
News|Videos|March 6, 2025
Selecting the Optimal CDK4/6 Regimen for First-Line Therapy
Author(s)Joyce O’Shaughnessy, MD, Alison Conlin, MD
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Dr. O’Shaughnessy to Dr. Conlin: What is your preferred CDK4/6 regimen in the first-line metastatic setting?
- How do patient factors like visceral crisis, bone-only disease, or comorbidities influence your decision?
- What toxicity concerns inform your choice of CDK4/6 inhibitor?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Many patients with IDH-mutant glioma continued to receive vorasidenib as directed in the real-world GLIO-ADHERE claims analysis.

Mirdametinib produced stable disease or partial responses in adults and children with plexiform neurofibromas who had received another MEK inhibitor.

Longer follow-up of the phase 3 INDIGO trial showed that vorasidenib lowered seizure rates in IDH-mutant glioma, an effect driven by oligodendroglioma.

Many patients with BRAF-altered pediatric low-grade glioma stayed off therapy after planned tovorafenib cessation in the 4-year FIREFLY-1 update.

Sarah Goldberg, MD, MPH, details how clinicians can choose among frontline regimens, act on resistance mechanisms, and incorporate ADCs and newer agents across the spectrum of EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

The FDA approved pimicotinib for tenosynovial giant cell tumor, accepted a gedatolisib filing in advanced breast cancer, and more.

Serial amino acid PET flagged responses earlier than MRI in IDH-mutant glioma treated with vorasidenib, interim data show.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Dr Johnson on Immune Activation With Indoximod-Based Chemo-Immunotherapy in Recurrent Ependymoma
2
Tovorafenib Sustains Treatment-Free Intervals in R/R BRAF-Altered Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma
3
Dr Miller on Whole Genome Sequencing of CSF ctDNA in High-Grade Glioma
4
Patient Preferences Steer Decisions as Options Multiply Across EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
5
