OncLive: What does the future look like for surgery developments in ovarian cancer?
Slomovitz: We’re learning more. [The MIRRORS-FROZEN trial (NCT06638593) is] ongoing to see if re-evaluated robotics can play a role vs open surgery. The ongoing phase 3 LANCE trial [NCT04575935] is investigating minimally invasive interval debulking surgery instead of an open procedure [in patients with stage IIIC to IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer]. We’ll learn a lot from that.
A lot of previous trials [investigated] neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking. We’re going to continue to learn more. We learned from the LION trial [NCT00712218] that you don’t need to do systemic lymphadenopathy for patients [with advanced ovarian cancer], but we’re going to continue to make progress, which we’re excited about.
What trials might signal future shifts in the PROC setting?
KEYNOTE-B96 Trial: Data Highlights From ESMO 2025
- The addition of pembrolizumab to weekly paclitaxel significantly improved PFS in the intention-to-treat population at the second interim analysis, reaching a median of 8.3 months compared with 6.4 months for the placebo group (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86; P < .0001).
- This trial represents the first phase 3 study in ovarian cancer to show a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit for an immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen, with the pembrolizumab arm achieving a median OS at the second interim analysis of 18.2 months (95% CI, 15.3-21.0) vs 14.0 months (95% CI, 12.5-16.1) in the population of patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score of at least 1 (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.94; P = .0053).
- Although the incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse effects was higher in the pembrolizumab group (67.5%) vs the placebo group (55.3%), the safety profile of the pembrolizumab combination remained consistent with those of the individual therapies.
The world of ovarian cancer continues to change. [One of] the most dramatic studies that we’ve seen of late is the [ROSELLA trial evaluating] relacorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, [plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced PROC]. Most recently, at the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, we saw the KEYNOTE-B96 data with pembrolizumab [plus weekly paclitaxel in patients with PROC].
Both those studies used weekly taxanes. The ROSELLA trial used nab-paclitaxel, and KEYNOTE-B96 used weekly paclitaxel. They demonstrated overall survival advantages when adding agents—whether relacorilant or pembrolizumab—[to the taxanes]. That is exciting. Data with raludotatug deruxtecan [in PROC] were also presented [at ESMO 2025], and that’s exciting.
What long-term and ongoing research highlights advances in the platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer treatment paradigm?
In the platinum-sensitive setting, we’re going to be seeing maintenance trials, [such as] the rinatabart sesutecan [Rina-S; GEN1184] data from the phase 3 RAINFOL-04 study [NCT07225270] that’s open and ongoing. The Rina-S antibody-drug conjugate data in ovarian cancer are promising. There are so many good things going on.
The phase 3 PAOLA-1 trial [NCT02477644] data [showed] great first-line maintenance [results] in [patients who were] homologous recombination deficient or [with] BRCA [mutations] with olaparib [Lynparza] plus bevacizumab [Avastin]. The phase 3 SOLO-1 data [NCT01844986] withstood the test of time. The long-term follow-up data continue to show the advantage [of maintenance olaparib, which] is giving cures in some patients with [newly diagnosed, advanced] ovarian cancer, which is exciting.
What therapies are emerging for patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer?
In low-grade serous ovarian cancer, the longer we investigate it, the more we realize it’s not at all like the typical high-grade serous ovarian cancers. If anything, it’s more like the hormone receptor–positive breast cancers. We need to come up with better treatment options. It’s not a very chemotherapy-sensitive disease. Hormonal therapy in the maintenance setting, as reported [in 2017] by David M. Gershenson, MD, [of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston], et al, probably has a benefit in preventing recurrences due to the disease.
But [2025] was an exciting year. We investigated the MEK/FAK inhibitor [combination avutometinib plus defactinib], and this received accelerated FDA approval [for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer who have previously been treated with systemic therapy. That was] encouraging. We’re still waiting for the phase 3 RAMP 301 trial [NCT06072781] data. This is a confirmatory trial to see whether [avutometinib plus defactinib] will be for all-comers or for the KRAS-mutated population. In addition, data [from the phase 2 GOG 3026 trial (NCT03673124), which] I’ve reported previously and which were accepted into the Journal of Clinical Oncology [in December 2025], evaluated the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib [Kisqali] with letrozole in patients with recurrent disease. [This combination] generated an approximately 30% overall response rate.
References
- Lorusso D, Quesada S, Chan JK, et al. ROSELLA (GOG3073, ENGOTov72, APGOT-OV10): relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel in the subgroup of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) previously exposed to a PARP inhibitor. Ann Oncol. 2025;36(suppl 2):S1588-1589. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.09.057
- Colombo N, Zsiros E, Sebastianelli A, et al. Pembrolizumab vs placebo plus weekly paclitaxel ± bevacizumab in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the randomized double-blind phase III ENGOT-ov65/KEYNOTE-B96 study. Ann Oncol. 2025;36(suppl 2):S1582. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.09.049