Novel Hsp Inhibitor May Offer NSCLC Salvage Option

Article

Salvage therapy combining the novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor ganetespib with docetaxel significantly improved overall survival in some patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD

Salvage therapy combining the novel heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor ganetespib with docetaxel significantly improved overall survival (OS) in some patients with non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase IIb/III GALAXY-1 trial. The results were presented at a press conference at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).    

“This is the first randomized trial to document improvement in efficacy of an Hsp90 inhibitor in patients with cancer,” said Suresh Ramalingam, MD, professor of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and director of the Division of Medical Oncology at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

In GALAXY-1, ganetespib was administered following progression on first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. If approved, the drug would become the first newly available option in this setting in more than a decade. However, the data, while promising, came with some reservations.

While a significant survival benefit was observed in a prespecified group of patients whose time since diagnosis of advanced disease was >6 months, the survival improvement for the overall study population was not statistically significant. Even within the >6 month subgroup, the data were less robust than interim results reported last September at the 2012 Congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology. Further, it had been hoped that mutational analysis in GALAXY-1 would reveal a potential biomarker for ganetespib, and this has not yet happened.

Still, hope remains that a phase III study will support use of ganetespib in the salvage setting. “This research unto itself isn’t practice changing, but I think it does merit further investigation in this prespecified subgroup [of patients >6 months postdiagnosis]” said Marjorie G. Zauderer, MD, an ASCO spokesperson who participated in the press briefing.  

Heat shock proteins have long been an enticing target for cancer researchers. The proteins are called “chaperones” because newly formed proteins require their assistance to become structurally active and perform their biologic function. In lung cancer, proteins such as EGFR and ALK, which stimulate tumor growth, depend on Hsp90 for activation. The promise with ganetespib is that by inhibiting Hsp90, multiple oncoproteins that fuel lung cancer would be inhibited at the same time.

The phase II open-label GALAXY-1 trial randomized 252 patients with stage III/IV lung adenocarcinoma 1:1 to docetaxel alone (75 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; n = 127) or the same dose of docetaxel plus ganetespib (150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15; n = 125). The median patient age was 60 years, 56% were male, and 75% were current or former smokers. The median number of cycles administered was five for the combination arm versus four for docetaxel alone.

In the overall study population, a nonstatistically significant 2.4-month OS advantage was observed in the ganetespib arm versus the control arm (9.8 vs 7.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82; P = .082). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also slightly higher in the treatment arm (4.5 vs 3.2 months), but the benefit was also not statistically significant (HR = 0.84; P = .038).

In patients enrolled in the trial >6 months postdiagnosis (n = 176), however, there was a statistically significant 4.3-month OS advantage with ganetespib (10.7 vs 6.4 months; HR = 0.61; P = .0093). PFS was also significantly improved in the treatment arm (5.4 vs 3.4 months; HR = 0.61; P = .0041).

The ganetespib combination was well tolerated with a toxicity profile similar to docetaxel monotherapy and consistent with safety outcomes in previous ganetespib studies. In the treatment arm, the most common adverse event across all grades was diarrhea (48%), which was usually manageable through over-the-counter treatments. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the ganetespib versus the control arm were neutropenia (37% vs 38%), febrile neutropenia (11% vs 2%), and anemia (8% vs 2%).

The acceptable toxicity profile for ganetespib is critical because safety issues have derailed promising Hsp inhibitors in the past. “The first-generation of Hsp inhibitors had a lot of toxicities and formulation issues, and that’s why we didn’t see them deliver on their promise,” said Ramalingam.

GALAXY-1 has an adaptive design that includes two enrollment stages. The data presented at ASCO were the results of the primary enrollment stage. An extension enrollment phase focusing on biomarker analysis recently completed accrual, with results expected to be reported later this year. 

Thus far, EGFR and KRAS mutational status do not seem to be linked to the survival benefit observed with ganetespib. However, Ramalingam said it is too early to make definitive conclusions about these or any other potential biomarkers.

“The follow-up for these patients continues. Treatment for these patients continues. The last patient was enrolled less than four weeks ago. So it is too soon to make broad statements about those patient populations,” said Ramalingam.

Although GALAXY-1 is ongoing, Synta Pharmaceuticals, which manufacturers ganetespib, has already launched the confirmatory phase III GALAXY-2 trial.

The study will again compare second-line ganetespib plus docetaxel versus docetacel alone in advanced lung cancer patients with adenocarcinoma histology; however, this trial will only enroll patients who are >6 months from advanced disease diagnosis. The target enrollment is 500 patients and the primary endpoint is overall survival.

“If things go to plan, by end of next year, we should have GALAXY-2 completed,” said Ramalingam.

Ramalingam SS, Goss GD, Andric ZG, et al. A randomized study of ganetespib, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone for second-line therapy of lung adenocarcinoma (GALAXY-1). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 (suppl; abstr CRA8007).

<<<

View more from the 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Related Videos
Arya Amini, MD
Patrick I. Borgen, MD
Kari Hacker, MD, PhD, NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Janos L. Tanyi, MD, PhD, associate professor, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Reshma Lillaney Mahtani, DO
Christian Marth, MD, PhD, head, professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University
Mansoor Raza Mirza, MD, chief oncologist, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Judy Hayek, MD, gynecologic oncology fellow, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate College of Medicine
Leslie M. Randall, MD, MAS, professor, division head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – Gynecologic Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology
Dimitrios Nasioudis, MD, fellow, Gynecologic Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania