Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!


Commentary

Video

Dr Spira on RMC-9805 in KRAS G12D–Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Fact checked by:

Alexander I. Spira MD, PhD, FACP, FASCO, discusses data of RMC-9805 in previously treated, advanced KRAS G12D–mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

“Thirty-nine percent of patients had a 100% decrease in their KRAS G12D VAF [variant allele frequency] and 86% of patients had at least a 50% decline in that number. That tells us that patients who are responding [although] not [demonstrated] on imaging are also doing very well and that [contributes to] clinical benefit rate and, we hope, overall survival rate.”

Alexander I. Spira MD, PhD, FACP, FASCO, codirector, Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; director, Thoracic and Phase I Program, clinical assistant professor, Johns Hopkins, discusses data from a phase 1 study (NCT06040541) of RMC-9805 in previously treated, advanced KRAS G12D–mutated solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

RMC-9805 is a potent, orally bioavailable RAS(ON) G12D-selective covalent tricomplex inhibitor that is designed to directly inhibit RAS(ON) signaling. Among efficacy-evaluable patients with PDAC (n = 40), the overall response rate was 30% and the disease control rate was 80%. Additionally, among patients with PDAC who had circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data available at baseline (n = 28), 39% achieved a 100% decrease in KRAS G12D VAF and 86% experienced a decrease of greater than 50%, Spira explains.

The ctDNA findings indicate that patients who are responding but not displaying a response on imaging are benefiting from treatment with the agent, Spira says. Moreover, these findings provide an indication of response before overall and progression-free survival data are fully mature and can help inform larger, phase 3 study designs, Spira notes.

In terms of safety, no patients of any disease histology (n = 179) experienced treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) leading to treatment discontinuation and 3% had TRAEs leading to dose reduction. Any-grade TRAEs included nausea (30%), diarrhea (16%), vomiting (15%) increased alanine aminotransferase levels (7%), increased aspartate aminotransferase levels (6%), and rash (3%). Investigators concluded that the safety and clinical activity findings support the ongoing development of RMC-9805 as monotherapy and as a combination component.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Elizabeth Lee, MD, a gynecologic oncologist and the gynecologic oncology program's liaison to the Center for Cancer Therapeutics Innovation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Taliya Lantsman, MD, a hematology/oncology fellow at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, FACOG, director, Early Drug Development, clinical medical director, professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery, codirector, Ovarian Cancer Moonshot Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jordyn Silverstein, MD
Rachel N. Grisham, MD
Toon Van Gorp, MD, PhD
Paul G. Richardson, MD
Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, discusses the potential to switch CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Dr Tolaney on Considerations for Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR+/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Dr Jagsi on Factors for RT Omission After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer