
Opinion|Videos|July 8, 2024
EMERALD Study Design and Results for Elacestrant
Key opinion leaders examine the EMERALD trial, which evaluates the efficacy of elacestrant in patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer, focusing on the subgroup analysis of patients with visceral metastases, and explore how the trial's design and results have influenced their clinical practice.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

- Please provide some background on the EMERALD trial evaluating elacestrant in HR+ HER2- mBC as well as subgroup data in patients with visceral metastases (
Shah et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024 )- How have the EMERALD trial impacted your use of Elacestrant in clinical practice, particularly in terms of patients’ selection and treatment sequencing?
- What are your impressions of the overall and subgroup data from EMERALD? Does it expand the ideal patient population for elacestrant?
- For a patient with metastatic breast cancer to bones, liver, and lungs who has an ESR1 mutation, how does this inform treatment selection between continuing endocrine therapy versus switching to other targeted agents or chemotherapy?
- Would elacestrant be an ideal next line treatment for this patient?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Relacorilant Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Meets OS End Point of ROSELLA Trial in PROC
2
Treatment Individualization Is Increasingly Vital With T-DXd Poised to Enter Early-Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer Paradigm
3
FDA Approves Guardant360 as Encorafenib Companion Diagnostic in BRAF V600E-Mutant mCRC
4
INAVO123 Set to Determine Upfront Role of Inavolisib in PIK3CA-Mutant, HR+ Breast Cancer
5
























































































