Importance of Molecular Testing in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

EP: 1.Evolving Treatment Landscape of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

EP: 2.HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Treatment Armamentarium

EP: 3.Factors in Selecting Frontline Therapy for HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

EP: 4.PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3: Time to Chemotherapy on Palbociclib + Endocrine Therapy

EP: 5.MONALEESA-2 and MONALEESA-3: Frontline Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy

EP: 6.MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3: Pooled Analysis of Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant

EP: 7.HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Selecting From Approved CDK4/6 Inhibitors

Now Viewing

EP: 8.Importance of Molecular Testing in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

EP: 9.HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Real-World Data on CDK4/6 Inhibitors

EP: 10.Mechanisms of Resistance to CDK4/6- and ER-Targeted Therapy in Metastatic BC

EP: 11.Overcoming Resistance in HR+/HER2- mBC: Novel ADC and SARM Therapy

EP: 12.Overcoming Resistance in HR+/HER2- mBC: Other Novel Targeted Agents

EP: 13.Addressing Unmet Needs in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

EP: 14.HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: Excitement for Upcoming Clinical Trial Readouts

Transcript:

Richard Finn, MD: Molecular testing has become very important in medical oncology and cancer medicine. We have drugs now that are approved and target specific alterations in many cancers, including ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. When we look at the CDK4/6 data sets, these studies broadly included patients just based on immunochemistry assays, specifically ER and PR receptor status, and then HER2 status based on molecular studies, generally a FISH [fluorescence in situ hybridization]-based assay. However, we do know that there is a certain incidence of genetic alterations that occur that do not only have prognostic but predictive significance as well.

For example, PI3 kinase mutations occur in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. These have been associated with benefit to the PI3 kinase inhibitor, alpelisib, in combination with fulvestrant. Generally, that data has been generated in the second-line setting after prior AI [aromatase inhibitor]. We now have some data, even in patients who had prior CDK inhibitors, there appears to be a benefit to those drugs. In addition, BRCA mutations occur in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, though to a lower frequency than seen in other subtypes of the disease. We know that the PARP inhibitors have a very important role in managing this subgroup of patients, especially germline mutations and also estrin receptor mutations. ESR1 mutations occur in patients with ER+ breast cancer, mostly in patients who have had prior aromatase inhibitors. When we have a patient, who is presenting with newly diagnosed ER- positive HER2-negative breast cancer, it is not unreasonable to send off molecular profiling for these alterations, so you know how to approach these patients in the future. One issue that arises is that we do not use these markers in selection of frontline therapy. I think still most of us view the data with CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy as being the most significant in this population based on PFS tolerability and now overall survival data.

One of the key questions is what do we do when patients progress on a CDK4/6 inhibitor? Knowing the mutation status might be helpful. Studies that have been done on patients who are progressing on CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown that the development of mutations that are associated or hypotheses that hypothesized as being important for CDK4/6 resistance such as mutations in the cyclin-D-Rb pathway or cyclin-E pathway. These do not occur very frequently. More frequently, what we see are acquired mutations in the endocrine pathway and specifically ESR1 mutations. I think patients with ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer do need molecular profiling. It does necessarily affect choice in the frontline setting. However, having that data early on can help you develop your treatment plan moving forward as patients receive their treatment. It is not unreasonable to repeat profiling at disease progression to see what acquired alterations may have occurred that might influence your choice of treatment moving forward. We will see data at the ASCO [American Society of Clinical Oncology] 2022 meeting of the use of CDK inhibitors beyond progression. It’ll be very interesting to see what that data looks like, especially in regard to any new mutation data that comes out of that study.

Transcript edited for clarity.