
Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Approaches EU Approval in Unresectable or Advanced HCC
Key Takeaways
- Nivolumab and ipilimumab showed improved median overall survival in unresectable HCC compared to lenvatinib or sorafenib in the CheckMate -9DW trial.
- The combination therapy achieved higher objective response rates and longer duration of response than the control treatments.
The EMA’s CHMP has adopted a positive opinion regarding frontline nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended the approval of nivolumab (Opdivo) paired with ipilimumab (Yervoy) for the frontline treatment of adult patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1
The positive opinion is based on data from the phase 3
“HCC is the predominant type of liver cancer globally, including in the European Union, and when diagnosed at the advanced or unresectable stage, prognosis and overall survival remain sub-optimal with conventional therapy,” Dana Walker, MD, MSCE, vice president of the Opdivo global program lead at Bristol Myers Squibb, stated in a news release.1 “The positive opinion received by the CHMP is a significant step forward in providing patients with additional treatment options, and we look forward to the upcoming European Commission review and the potential to expand the treatment landscape for adult patients with unresectable or advanced HCC.”
Checking Out CheckMate -9DW
The global, open-label,
Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 1 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) nivolumab plus 3 mg/kg of IV ipilimumab every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles followed by 480 mg of nivolumab every 4 weeks or investigator’s choice of 8 mg or 12 mg of lenvatinib once daily or 400 mg of sorafenib twice daily. Treatment continued until progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, withdrawn consent, or maximum treatment duration was reached. They were stratified by etiology (hepatitis B virus vs hepatitis C virus vs uninfected), microvascular invasion/extrahepatic spread (present vs absent), and alpha-fetoprotein level (<400 ng/mL vs ≥400 ng/mL).
OS served as the trial’s primary end point, and secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and RECIST 1.1 criteria, as well as time to symptom deterioration. Exploratory end points included progression-free survival (PFS) by BICR and RECIST 1.1 criteria and safety.
Additional Efficacy Revelations
The data cutoff date for the first results of the trial shared during the
The median PFS with the doublet was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.6-10.5) vs 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.9-11.1) with lenvatinib or sorafenib (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72-1.06). The 18- and 24-month PFS rates with ipilimumab plus nivolumab were 34% and 28%, respectively; with lenvatinib or sorafenib, these respective rates were 28% and 12%.
Safety Spotlight
The median duration of treatment with the doublet was 4.7 months (range, <1 to 24.4) vs 6.9 months (range, <1 to 45.8) with lenvatinib or sorafenib. Treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) occurred in 84% and 91% of patients, respectively; they were grade 3 or 4 for 41% and 42% of patients, respectively.2 Serious TRAEs were experienced by 28% and 14% of patients, respectively, with 25% and 13% of these effects grade 3 or 4 in severity. Any TRAEs led to discontinuation for 18% of those given the doublet and 10% of those who received investigator’s choice of treatment. Twelve treatment-related deaths occurred in the doublet arm vs 3 in the control arm.
The most common any-grade TRAEs reported in the investigative and control arms, respectively, were pruritus (28% vs 3%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (20% vs 8%), increased alanine aminotransferase level (19% vs 6%), rash (19% vs 9%), hypothyroidism (12% vs 24%), diarrhea (14% vs 35%), asthenia (10% vs 16%), hyperthyroidism (10% vs 2%), fatigue (8% vs 15%), decreased appetite (7% vs 22%), nausea (6% vs 10%), hypertension (2% vs 41%), Palmar-Plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (2% vs 30%), decreased weight (2% vs 11%), and dysphonia (<1% vs 15%).
Navigating Beyond Today’s News
In August 2024, the
References
- Bristol Myers Squibb receives positive CHMP opinion for Opdivo (nivolumab) plus Yervoy (ipilimumab) as a first-line treatment option for adult patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. News release. Bristol Myers Squibb. January 31, 2025. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://news.bms.com/news/corporate-financial/2025/Bristol-Myers-Squibb-Receives-Positive-CHMP-Opinion-for-Opdivo-nivolumab-plus-Yervoy-ipilimumab-as-a-First-Line-Treatment-Option-for-Adult-Patients-with-Unresectable-or-Advanced-Hepatocellular-Carcinoma/default.aspx
- Galle PR, Decaens T, Kudo M, et al. Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs lenvatinib (LEN) or sorafenib (SOR) as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): First results from CheckMate 9DW. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA4008. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA4008
- Kudo M, Yau T, Decaens T, et al. Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs lenvatinib (LEN) or sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): CheckMate 9DW expanded analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 4):520. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.520
- Bristol Myers Squibb receives US Food and Drug Administration sBLA acceptance for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. News release. Bristol Myers Squibb. August 21, 2024. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://news.bms.com/news/details/2024/Bristol-Myers-Squibb-Receives-U.S.-Food-and-Drug-Administration-sBLA-Acceptance-for-First-Line-Treatment-of-Unresectable-Hepatocellular-Carcinoma/default.aspx


































