
Opinion|Videos|January 3, 2025
Treatment Goals and Unmet Needs in R/R AML
Panelists discuss how achieving responses with second-line treatment options after venetoclax-based regimens remains challenging, and explore strategies for bridging therapy to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients who relapse post venetoclax while also addressing the evolving management of patients following transplant.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Briefly comment on your clinical experience with the difficulty achieving responses with the currently available second line and beyond treatment options after patients are treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine (or decitabine).
- How do current therapies meet the needs of patients post-venetoclax failure?
- How often are you able to bring your patients to allo-HSCT once they relapse post venetoclax? How are utilizing the currently available R/R options as bridging therapy to allo-HSCT?
- How are you managing patients following a transplant? Do you see this changing in the future?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Long-Term Cilta-Cel Data Show Low Rates of PFS Events in Standard-Risk R/R Myeloma
2
FDA Updates Axi-Cel Label to Remove Limitation of Use in R/R PCNSL
3
Real-World Data Support Clinical Benefit With Lifileucel in Previously Treated Advanced Melanoma
4
Nonresponse to Bridging Therapy and Peak ALC After Cilta-Cel Are Associated With Neurotoxicity, NRM in Myeloma
5



































