News

Article

Abemaciclib/Hormonal Therapy Combo Yields Clinical Activity in LGSOC/EEC

Key Takeaways

  • Abemaciclib plus hormonal therapy showed high CBRs in LGSOC (82%) and EEC (67%), but low in HGSOC (38%).
  • Median PFS was 12.0 months for LGSOC, 6.1 months for EEC, and 1.5 months for HGSOC.
SHOW MORE

Treatment with abemaciclib plus hormonal therapy showed promise in LGSOC/EEC but not in HGSOC, and larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Image credit: Crystal light - stock.adobe.com

Image credit: Crystal light

- stock.adobe.com

Clinical benefit rates (CBRs) of 82% and 67% were observed among patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC), respectively, who received abemaciclib (Verzenio) plus hormonal therapy, according to results from a phase 2 trial (NCT04469764) presented at the 2025 Society of Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer (SGO).

Efficacy data from the single-institution trial revealed that among patients with LGSOC, EEC, and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-not reached [NR]), 6.1 months (95% CI, 2.0-12.3), and 1.5 months (95% CI, 0.3-6.0), respectively. Additionally, the 24-week PFS rates in the respective arms were 72.3%, 50.0%, and 12.5%.

Additional results revealed that among patients with LGSOC, there were 0 complete responses (CR), 9.0% of patients experienced a partial response (PR), 72.7% had stable disease (SD), and the CBR was 82%. In those with EEC, the CR and PR rates were 6.2% and 12.5%, 43.7% of patients had stable disease, and the CBR was 67%. Additionally, among those with HGSOC, there were no CRs or PRs, and the CBR was 38%.

“Abemaciclib [plus] hormonal therapy demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with recurrent LGSOC and EEC,” Jordyn Silverstein, MD, hematologic oncology fellow at the University of California, Los Angeles, stated with study coauthors. “In HGSOC, despite select patients with CDK4/6 activating features, low clinical activity was observed. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.”

The nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 trial enrolled patients with recurrent ovarian cancer or EEC to receive 150 mg of twice daily abemaciclib plus hormonal therapy consisting of either aromatase inhibition or fulvestrant (Faslodex). Treatment continued until disease progression per RECEST criteria, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent illness, or withdrawal.

The trial initially screened 46 patients, 5 of whom were later excluded due to 2 instances of rapid disease progression and single instances of severe medical condition, ongoing radiation, and inadequate contraception agreement. Of the 41 enrolled, 6 did not have a response assessment, including 2 due to treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) and another 4 who began treatment less than 2 months before analysis. A total of 35 patients were included in the response analysis, including 8 who were still on study at the time of data cut-off.

Of the 41 patients enrolled, 49% and 51% had ovarian cancer and EEC, respectively. Additionally, of those with ovarian cancer, 40% had HGSOC, and 60% had LGSOC. The most prevalent ovarian high-grade markers included CDKN2A loss (62%) and CDKN2B loss (25%). Additionally, the most common disease stages at diagnosis were stages III and IV (37% each), followed by stage I (20%), and then stage II (7%).

Patients on trial had a median age of 61.2 (SD, 12.3) at consent, and 80.5% were White and not Hispanic or Latino. The average number of lines of therapy among this group was 3.2 lines (SD, 2.4), with 19.5% of patients having 5 or more lines of therapy. Patients having 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy both accounted for 21.9% of the population, 24.3% had 3 prior lines of therapy, and 12.2% of patients had 4 prior lines of therapy. Additionally, 17% of patients had prior hormonal therapy.

The primary end point of the trial was 24-week PFS rate. Secondary end points included CBR, objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST criteria, PFS, and safety. An exploratory end point was relationship between response and CDK4/6 activation features.

The most common AEs included diarrhea (any-grade: 61%, grade 3/4: 2%), anemia (29%, 12%), fatigue (24%, 2%), nausea (22%, 2%), neutropenia (14%, 5%), and thrombocytopenia (12%, 5%).

Reference

  1. Silverstein J, Grande IK, Kivork C, et al. An open-label phase II study of the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, combined with hormonal therapy in selected patients with recurrent ovarian or endometrial cancer. Presented at the 2025 Society of Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer (SGO); Seattle, WA, March 14-17, 2025.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Latest CME

View All
Addressing Unmet Needs in HER2+ Metastatic BTC
Video

Addressing Unmet Needs in HER2+ Metastatic BTC

Apr 18th 2025 - Apr 19th 2026

online-activity
Community Oncology Connections™: Case Discussions in TNBC…Navigating the Latest Advances and Impact of Disparities in Care | North Carolina
Video

Community Oncology Connections™: Case Discussions in TNBC…Navigating the Latest Advances and Impact of Disparities in Care | North Carolina

Apr 17th 2025 - May 23rd 2025

online-activity
Community Oncology Connections™: Community Oncologists’ Role in Selecting Optimal Oral SERD Treatment for HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer | Minnesota
Video

Community Oncology Connections™: Community Oncologists’ Role in Selecting Optimal Oral SERD Treatment for HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer | Minnesota

Apr 17th 2025 - May 23rd 2025

online-activity