Dr Weiss on the Ongoing Investigation of Tebentafusp With or Without Pembrolizumab in Non-Uveal Melanoma

News
Video

In Partnership With:

Sarah Weiss, MD, discusses the ongoing phase 2/3 TEBE-AM trial of tebentafusp with or without pembrolizumab in a subset of pretreated patients with non-uveal melanoma.

Sarah Weiss, MD, medical oncologist, director, Melanoma/Cutaneous Oncology Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute, associate professor, Division of Medical Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, discusses the ongoing phase 2/3 TEBE-AM trial (NCT05549297) of tebentafusp-tebn (Kimmtrak) with or without pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in a subset of pretreated patients with non-uveal melanoma.

Tebentafusp monotherapy gained FDA approval in January 2022 for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01–positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma, based on the results of the phase 3 IMCgp100-202 trial (NCT03070392). The agent has also demonstrated benefit in non-uveal melanoma when administered early in the treatment course. However, its efficacy and safety in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor has not yet been determined in non-uveal melanoma.

Based on this need, a multicenter study was designed to compare the use of single-agent tebentafusp vs tebentafusp plus pembrolizumab or investigator's choice of subsequent therapy, Weiss begins. The trial will enrolled patients who have HLA-A*02:01–positive non-uveal melanoma and have previously progressed on or within 6 months of the last dose of an anti–PD-1 or –PD-L1agent, received ipilimumab (Yervoy), and received a BRAF/MEK inhibitor regimen if the patient harbors an actionable BRAF mutation. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive tebentafusp monotherapy (arm A), tebentafusp plus pembrolizumab (arm B), or proceed straight to efficacy follow-up (arm C), Weiss details.

Those in arm C will receive investigator's choice of salvage chemotherapy, retreatment, investigational agents in a clinical trial setting, or best supportive care, she adds. This allows for a comparison between tebentafusp-containing regimens and standard real-world treatment options, Weiss explains. 

Patients in the phase 2 portion will be stratified by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)status, while those who proceed to the phase 3 portion will be stratified by both LDH and BRAF-mutation status. Randomization to the phase 3 portion will begin after phase 2 accrual is competed. The primary objectives of this study include circulating tumor DNA reduction relative to baseline in the phase 2 portion, and overall survival in both phases. The phase 2 portion is currently enrolling patients. 

Related Videos
Karim Chamie, MD, associate professor, urology, the University of California, Los Angeles
Mike Lattanzi, MD, medical oncologist, Texas Oncology
Ramez N. Eskander, MD
Elias Jabbour, MD
Shruti Tiwari, MD
Jeffrey P. Townsend, PhD
Marina Baretti, MD
George R. Simon, MD, FACP, FCCP
Saad Z. Usmani, MD, MBA, FACP, FASCO
Rebecca Kristeleit, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, PhD