
Opinion|Videos|November 1, 2024
Evidence-Based Approaches to Intensive Chemotherapy in Secondary AML
Author(s)Margaret T. Kasner, MD, Christian Fidler, MD
Panelists discuss how the NCCN guidelines recommend intensive chemotherapy options, including traditional 7+3 and CPX-351, for newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML patients, with treatment selection based on individual patient factors and potential adverse effects.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please discuss the NCCN guideline recommended first-line treatment options for patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML who are potential candidates for intensive chemotherapy induction.
- Please briefly review the study design & efficacy study of CPX-351 vs. 7+3.
- How do you monitor and manage potential adverse effects in these patients?
- Describe management of both 7+3 and CPX-351.
- How does your approach differ between the two regimens?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Long-Term Cilta-Cel Data Show Low Rates of PFS Events in Standard-Risk R/R Myeloma
2
Nonresponse to Bridging Therapy and Peak ALC After Cilta-Cel Are Associated With Neurotoxicity, NRM in Myeloma
3
FDA Updates Axi-Cel Label to Remove Limitation of Use in R/R PCNSL
4
FDA Underscores Risks Associated With DPD Deficiency and Capecitabine/5-FU Use in Cancer Care
5



































