
Opinion|Videos|April 28, 2025
Optimizing Therapy in HR+/HER2+ Breast Cancer: Balancing Endocrine, HER2-Targeted, and Chemotherapy Options
Panelists discuss how treatment strategies for triple-positive breast cancer (hormone receptor [HR] positive and HER2 positive) differ from those for hormone receptor–negative, HER2-positive disease, with emphasis on balancing endocrine therapy, HER2-targeted therapy, and chemotherapy.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Now Playing
Video content above is prompted by the following:
Treatment Strategies for Triple-Positive Breast Cancer
Panel Introduction
Moderators and Panelists:
- Dr Kelly McCann, MD, PhD - Breast medical oncologist and assistant professor at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
- Dr Gregory Vidal, MD, PhD - Breast medical oncologist at West Cancer Center and Research Institute; associate professor at the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center; director of clinical research at West Cancer Center
Key Themes:
- Triple-positive breast cancer characteristics
- Defined as HR-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer
- Shows different prognosis and treatment response compared with HR-negative, HER2-positive disease
- According to SEER database, has better prognosis than HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
- About half exhibit luminal A or B phenotype (Kim et al, 2019)
- Standard treatment approaches
- Standard of care includes taxane with pertuzumab and trastuzumab
- Chemotherapy eventually discontinued with antiestrogen therapy added to the backbone
- PATINA study showed adding cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor to antiestrogen therapy resulted in progression-free survival benefit
- CDK 4/6 inhibitors and triplet therapy
- monarcHER trial demonstrated better outcomes with CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus antiestrogen therapy and trastuzumab compared with chemotherapy and trastuzumab
- PATINA trial showed adding palbociclib to maintenance therapy improved progression-free survival (44.3 months vs 29.1 months)
- Toxicity considerations include neutropenia, gastrointestinal adverse effects, fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cardiac monitoring requirements
Notable Insights:
- Dr Vidal noted: “Standard of care in this setting is really a taxane with pertuzumab and trastuzumab with chemotherapy eventually dropping off, and with the addition of antiestrogen therapy to that backbone.”
- Dr McCann emphasized: “I think it’s very important to remember that even though we think of triple-positive cancers as predominantly HER2 driven, that’s not necessarily true. There’s actually a lot of crosstalk between HER2 and the estrogen receptor pathways in terms of growth signals.”
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
FDA Approves Daratumumab and Hyaluronidase Plus VRd for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
2
PD-L1 Expression Is More Predictive of Response to Pembrolizumab on Metastatic Sites in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
3
NP-G1-044 Receives FDA Orphan Drug Designation for Pancreatic Cancer
4
Meta-Analysis Characterizes Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Hyperprogression in Renal Medullary Carcinoma
5



































