
Opinion|Videos|May 2, 2025
Overall Survival as a Driver of 1L EGFRm NSCLC Treatment Selection
Panelists discuss how overall survival is an important but not the only consideration in treatment decision-making, with factors such as patient characteristics, disease burden, and quality of life also being critical.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Weighing Overall Survival in Treatment Decisions
Main Discussion Topics:
- The relative importance of overall survival as an end point in clinical decision-making
- Additional factors beyond survival data that influence treatment selection
- Considerations regarding treatment sequencing and patient crossover between therapies
Key Points for Physicians:
- Overall survival is important but not the sole determining factor in treatment decisions
- Patient factors including age, disease burden, performance status, and social situation must be considered
- Treatment sequencing (eg, when to use amivantamab—first-line or later) requires careful consideration
Notable Insights:
The panelists note that only 1% to 2% of patients in the osimertinib arm of MARIPOSA crossed over to receive amivantamab later, raising questions about optimal sequencing strategies.
Clinical Significance:
Although overall survival data are compelling, treatment decisions require balancing efficacy with patient-specific factors and considerations of toxicity profiles and quality of life.
Advertisement
Related to this article

The filing is supported by phase 3 REZILIENT3 data showing a median PFS of 14.5 vs 8.5 months with zipalertinib plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy.

A European Commission decision on belzutifan plus lenvatinib in pretreated advanced ccRCC is expected within 2 months, based on LITESPARK-011 data.

The phase 3 4WARD trial is evaluating mavorixafor for reducing infection rates and raising neutrophil counts in patients with primary chronic neutropenia.

Did you catch all of this week's top oncology news? Test your knowledge with OncLive's Weekly News Quiz.

Age, geographic location, transportation barriers, and language and communication barriers may limit patient opportunities to participate in research.

Targeting two alternate pathways at the same time led to improved outcomes in multiple preclinical models of advanced breast cancer.

Updated LEGEND cohort 1 data showed a 56% CR rate and a 24% 12-month CR rate with detalimogene in BCG-unresponsive, high-risk NMIBC with CIS.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Dr Wander on the Evolving First-Line and Post–T-DXd Landscape in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
2
Dr Levy on Where Iza-Bren May Fit Following Osimertinib In EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
3
Combination Therapy Overcomes Treatment Resistance in Breast Cancer Models
4
Dr Levy on How the EGFR-Targeted Therapy Landscape Has Evolved in NSCLC
5

