
Opinion|Videos|May 2, 2025
Balancing Survival and Quality of Life in 1L EGFRm NSCLC Treatment Decisions
Panelists discuss how treatment choice involves weighing quality of life against treatment burden, considering factors such as hospital visits for infusions vs oral medications at home.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Quality of Life vs Treatment Burden
Main Discussion Topics:
- Impact of different treatment regimens on patient quality of life
- Comparison of treatment burdens: oral therapy vs infusion-based regimens
- Consideration of financial costs and logistical challenges associated with different treatments
Key Points for Physicians:
- Treatment burden varies significantly: osimertinib is a daily pill with visits every 3 months, whereas combination therapies require infusions every 2 to 3 weeks
- More-intensive regimens involve greater “medicalization” of patient care
- Financial and logistical costs (travel, parking, childcare) must be considered
Notable Insights:
Patients fall on different ends of the spectrum regarding treatment preferences—some prioritize efficacy regardless of burden, and others prefer less- intensive regimens to maintain quality of life.
Clinical Significance:
The treatment decision ultimately depends on aligning therapy choice with individual patient values, circumstances, and priorities related to efficacy, quality of life, and treatment burden.
Advertisement
Related to this article

The filing is supported by phase 3 REZILIENT3 data showing a median PFS of 14.5 vs 8.5 months with zipalertinib plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy.

A European Commission decision on belzutifan plus lenvatinib in pretreated advanced ccRCC is expected within 2 months, based on LITESPARK-011 data.

The phase 3 4WARD trial is evaluating mavorixafor for reducing infection rates and raising neutrophil counts in patients with primary chronic neutropenia.

Did you catch all of this week's top oncology news? Test your knowledge with OncLive's Weekly News Quiz.

Age, geographic location, transportation barriers, and language and communication barriers may limit patient opportunities to participate in research.

Targeting two alternate pathways at the same time led to improved outcomes in multiple preclinical models of advanced breast cancer.

Updated LEGEND cohort 1 data showed a 56% CR rate and a 24% 12-month CR rate with detalimogene in BCG-unresponsive, high-risk NMIBC with CIS.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Dr Wander on the Evolving First-Line and Post–T-DXd Landscape in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
2
Dr Levy on Where Iza-Bren May Fit Following Osimertinib In EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
3
Combination Therapy Overcomes Treatment Resistance in Breast Cancer Models
4
Dr Levy on How the EGFR-Targeted Therapy Landscape Has Evolved in NSCLC
5

