
Redefining AML Treatment: Integrating Biology, Fitness, and Expanding Targeted Options
The experts explore how AML therapy has entered a transformation driven by expanded biological understanding, increased therapeutic diversity, and improved precision.
Episodes in this series

The experts explore how AML therapy has entered a transformation driven by expanded biological understanding, increased therapeutic diversity, and improved precision. The panel reflects on how the field is shifting away from one-size-fits-all strategies toward a more nuanced alignment of patient fitness, disease mutation profile, and response trajectory. With new targeted agents and combination regimens, clinicians can optimize therapy not solely by age or performance status but by matching the biology of the disease to the mechanism of action of available drugs.
Central in this discussion is the evolving role of venetoclax-based therapy and its integration with targeted agents, including inhibitors of IDH, menin, and FLT3. The panel describes an emerging paradigm where older or unfit patients receive sophisticated combinations rather than single-agent low-intensity regimens. Meanwhile, fit patients may also benefit from triplets or mutation-driven regimens that blend intensive and targeted strategies, reflecting the field’s increasing ability to personalize therapy.
The segment also reinforces that dynamic reassessment must occur throughout treatment. The speakers highlight how clonal evolution can introduce new mutations mid-treatment, opening opportunities to add targeted agents and salvage strategies. Examples include patients developing new FLT3-ITD or IDH1/2 mutations, leading to meaningful therapeutic pivots.
They additionally emphasize the importance of monitoring treatment tolerance and marrow recovery, adjusting regimens based not just on protocol but on real-time biological feedback. The panel reiterates that MRD-guided interventions will likely expand in future years, supported by improved assays for KMT2A and other mutations.
Ultimately, this segment underscores an AML landscape in rapid evolution: one where biologically precise, patient-adapted approaches replace rigid treatment algorithms, and where ongoing reassessment is key to maximizing survival and minimizing toxicity.



































