
Opinion|Videos|May 1, 2025
Genomic Assays in Breast Cancer: Key Differences, Clinical Utility, and Test Selection
Panelists discuss how they primarily use the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) for estrogen receptor–positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2–) breast cancers with minimal nodal disease due to its robust data from multiple trials, whereas other assays such as the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) are better for evaluating extended endocrine therapy benefits.
Advertisement
Comparing Available Genomic Assays
Main Discussion Topics:
- Differentiating factors between various genomic assays (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, EndoPredict, Prosigna Breast Cancer Assay, BCI)
- Considerations for selecting the appropriate test for ER+/HER2– breast cancer
- Specific clinical scenarios where different assays may be preferred
Key Points for Physicians:
- The 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) is preferred for ER+/HER2– breast cancers with negative or minimal nodal involvement due to robust supporting clinical trial data.
- BCI is valuable for assessing extended endocrine therapy benefit.
- The 70-gene assay (MammaPrint) may be useful for specific clinical trials and some HER2+ cases.
Notable Insights:
- Oncotype DX is supported by extensive clinical data (>80 trials/registries involving ~100,000 patients) and has been incorporated into staging systems.
- Test selection should be driven by the specific clinical question being addressed.
Clinical Significance: Although the 21-gene assay remains the most widely validated option for ER+/HER2– breast cancer, physicians should consider the specific clinical context and question when selecting between available genomic testing options.
Advertisement
Related to this article

Divesiran lowered phlebotomy needs, raised ferritin, and improved MPN-10 symptom scores in phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera.

A Dana-Farber study identified an RNA surveillance defect that fuels melanoma through endogenous retroviral RNA.

Belantamab mafodotin–based therapy improved sustained MRD negativity rates in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Updated COMMANDS data showed durable RBC transfusion independence and a positive overall survival trend with luspatercept in lower-risk MDS.

Robert A. Winn, MD, discussed his path to becoming a physician, scientist, and leader at Fox Chase Cancer Center.

Updated analyses from a phase 2a study suggest durable survival with namodenosen in a subset of heavily pretreated patients with advanced PDAC.

Need a refresh on the current regulatory landscape for GI oncology? We've got you covered. Here's everything that moved the needle across GI malignancies this month.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Luspatercept Sustains Long-Term Transfusion Independence, Favorable OS Trend in ESA-Naive Lower-Risk MDS
2
Study Identifies RNA Surveillance Defect That Fuels Melanoma Through Endogenous Retroviral RNA
3
FDA Grants Breakthrough Device Designation to Merlin CP-GEP for Early-Stage Melanoma Risk Stratification
4
Belantamab Mafodotin Yields Sustained MRD Negativity in R/R Myeloma
5

