
Opinion|Videos|April 14, 2025
INTRIGUE Trial: Key Findings in Second-Line Setting
Experts discuss the key findings from the INTRIGUE trial comparing ripretinib to sunitinib in the second-line setting, focusing on efficacy endpoints like progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS on next line of therapy, and interpret the patient-reported outcome (PRO) and tolerability data reported in the study.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please walk us through the key findings from the
INTRIGUE trial comparing ripretinib to sunitinib in the second-line setting. What were the key efficacy end points evaluated in this study, and how did ripretinib perform compared to sunitinib on measures like PFS and PFS on next line of therapy? How do you interpret thePRO and tolerability data reported from INTRIGUE?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Track the Lung Cancer Abstracts That are Gaining Attention at ASCO 2026
2
FDA Approves Zenocutuzumab for NRG1 Fusion+ Cholangiocarcinoma
3
ADCs Reshape the Future of Lung Cancer Care: From Second-Line Therapy to Earlier Intervention
4
Capivasertib/Fulvestrant Yields Numerical OS Advantage in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN–Altered Breast Cancer
5




















































