
Opinion|Videos|April 14, 2025
INTRIGUE Trial: Key Findings in Second-Line Setting
Experts discuss the key findings from the INTRIGUE trial comparing ripretinib to sunitinib in the second-line setting, focusing on efficacy endpoints like progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS on next line of therapy, and interpret the patient-reported outcome (PRO) and tolerability data reported in the study.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please walk us through the key findings from the
INTRIGUE trial comparing ripretinib to sunitinib in the second-line setting. What were the key efficacy end points evaluated in this study, and how did ripretinib perform compared to sunitinib on measures like PFS and PFS on next line of therapy? How do you interpret thePRO and tolerability data reported from INTRIGUE?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
FDA Underscores Risks Associated With DPD Deficiency and Capecitabine/5-FU Use in Cancer Care
2
Nonresponse to Bridging Therapy and Peak ALC After Cilta-Cel Are Associated With Neurotoxicity, NRM in Myeloma
3
Orca-T With Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Yields Robust Efficacy in Hematologic Malignancies
4
TRX103 Tr1 Cell Therapy Shows Manageable Safety and Dose-Dependent Kinetics After HLA-Mismatched HCT in Hematologic Malignancies
5



































