
Opinion|Videos|April 14, 2025
INTRIGUE Trial: Key Findings in Second-Line Setting
Experts discuss the key findings from the INTRIGUE trial comparing ripretinib to sunitinib in the second-line setting, focusing on efficacy endpoints like progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS on next line of therapy, and interpret the patient-reported outcome (PRO) and tolerability data reported in the study.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Please walk us through the key findings from the
INTRIGUE trial comparing ripretinib to sunitinib in the second-line setting. What were the key efficacy end points evaluated in this study, and how did ripretinib perform compared to sunitinib on measures like PFS and PFS on next line of therapy? How do you interpret thePRO and tolerability data reported from INTRIGUE?
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on OncLive
1
Lurbinectedin-Based Triplet Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
2
Ultra-Sensitive ctDNA and CSF Liquid Biopsy May Refine Monitoring and Adaptive Trial Designs in Metastatic Breast Cancer
3
Anti–Gremlin-1 Therapy Plus Chemo Makes Waves in GI Malignancies
4
FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to IBI3003 in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
5



































