scout

Breast Cancer

Latest News


Latest Videos


CME Content


More News

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how in-house testing significantly reduces turnaround times by eliminating send-out delays and courier dependencies. This enables immediate sample processing, allowing for faster results delivery and prompt clinical decision-making. Health care facilities can optimize workflows through automated systems, clear communication protocols, and standardized testing procedures, minimizing bottlenecks between departments and facilitating quicker diagnosis and treatment initiation.

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how implementing in-house biomarker testing can significantly enhance patient care through faster turnaround times and streamlined decision-making processes. This approach reduces dependence on external laboratories while enabling more immediate clinical interventions. Key implementation considerations include staff expertise, quality control protocols, equipment costs, regulatory compliance, and testing volume to ensure operational efficiency and return on investment

Panelists discuss how the latest NCCN guidelines for targeted therapies and biomarker testing in advanced/metastatic breast cancer highlight the importance of biomarker-driven approaches, with particular emphasis on the need for next-generation sequencing testing in the first-line setting, the implications of HER2-low classification, and how the recent FDA approval of a PI3K inhibitor may impact testing practices and treatment strategies.

Panelists discuss how adjuvant therapy in HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer is influenced by key risk factors, with a focus on recent studies involving CDK4/6 inhibitors like abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, and how these treatments are shaping the adjuvant treatment strategy based on efficacy data from trials such as MonarchE, NATALEE, and PALLAS.

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how optimal biomarker testing requires careful balancing of multiple factors. Critical considerations include the turnaround time needed to inform timely treatment decisions, the comprehensiveness of testing panels to identify actionable mutations, and the demonstrated clinical utility of results for guiding therapy selection. Patient-specific factors such as cancer type, stage, prior treatments, and urgency of therapeutic decisions must guide test selection.

Panelists discuss how the NCCN guidelines for risk stratification in HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer inform clinical decision-making, with an emphasis on biomarker testing, the use of tools like RSClin N+, and the evolving role of CDK4/6 inhibitors and adjuvant therapies. They also address challenges in risk assessment and the integration of newer treatment strategies, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors in the early-stage setting.