Urothelial Cancer

Antoni Vilaseca, MD, PhD, explains the unique mechanism of the TAR-210 erdafitinib delivery system and expands on the key objectives, trial design, and patient characteristics of a phase 1 trial evaluating TAR-210 in patients with recurrent NMIBC or MIBC harboring select FGFR mutations or fusions.

Centering discussion on several clinical trials, key opinion leaders reflect on the role of adjuvant therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Expert perspectives on the evolving role of neoadjuvant therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with considerations for mainstay regimens.

Siamak Daneshmand, MD, discusses the rationale for investigating erdafitinib in patients with recurrent, intermediate-risk non–muscle invasive bladder cancer harboring FGFR3 or FGFR2 alterations.

Christopher W. Ryan, MD, discusses the implications of updated findings from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Terence Friedlander, MD, discusses the significance of the FDA approval of frontline enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab in patients with urothelial carcinoma.

The FDA has granted accelerated approval to enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (Padcev) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Switching their focus to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), panelists identify the treatment armamentarium in this setting.

A bird’s eye view of treatment modalities in urothelial carcinoma covering systemic, surgical, and bladder preserving strategies.

A brief review of sequencing patterns in urothelial carcinoma and the typical number of lines of therapy a patient may receive.

A panel of four key opinion leaders share real-world urothelial carcinoma practice patterns at their respective institutions.

Siamak Daneshmand, MD, shed light on the phase 2 THOR-2 study evaluating different cohorts of patients with recurrent NMIBC, key findings from cohorts 2 and 3, and how ongoing research seeks to move the needle forward with novel drug delivery methods.

Investigators are assessing the combination of avelumab and lurbinectedin as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who achieve a response or stable disease following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy in a single-arm phase 2 trial.

The Center for Drug Evaluation of the China National Medical Products Administration has accepted the biologics license application for enfortumab vedotin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who received prior treatment with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Expert Matthew D. Galsky, MD, shares his perspective on follow-up results from CheckMate 274, which analyzed adjuvant nivolumab in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Matthew Galsky, MD, discusses the key long-term findings and the clinical implications of the updated data from the phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial of nivolumab for the adjuvant treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, discusses key safety and efficacy data from the EV-103 trial supporting supplemental biologics license applications seeking FDA approval of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, discusses key baseline characteristics from the real-world PATRIOT II study of first-line avelumab maintenance therapy in metastatic urothelial cancer. 

The baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and responses to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving avelumab maintenance therapy were consistent with responses to usual therapy paradigms in the first-line induction setting.

The efficacy profile for avelumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma was consistent in a real-world setting with what had been reported in the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial.

First-line atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and gemcitabine trended toward improved overall survival compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

At extended follow-up, nivolumab monotherapy showed improved disease-free survival, non-urothelial tract recurrence-free survival, and disease-specific survival vs placebo in patients with resected, high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Atezolizumab monotherapy failed to show an improvement in overall survival compared with placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy and gemcitabine in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Matthew Galsky, MD, discusses the key findings from extended follow-up of the phase 3 CheckMate-274 trial in urothelial cancer.

Stephanie A. Berg, DO, discusses key ongoing trials in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.